-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:15:13 -0400, "Bill Jones" <bill@fccj.org> wrote: >It should be a syntax error in that the last \E belongs to >the LAST \U That still doesn't explain why it fails just by adding a \l that shouldn't affect \U or \L (but it does, by way of the reordering that MJD has brought to our attention). >The FIRST \L lost it's macro closure \E in the reordering... The perlop manpage says: \L Lowercase till \E \U Uppercase till \E \E End case modification Nowhere I read that they should be properly nested and that is not correct to "open" several levels of \L and \U and close them all with a single \E. In fact,=20 > print "\Ude LOS sus OJOS tan FUERTEMENTE llorando, \LGIRABA la CABEZA \Uy= ESTABALOS mirando\E"; > DE LOS SUS OJOS TAN FUERTEMENTE LLORANDO, giraba la cabeza Y ESTABALOS MI= RANDO it works till you put a \l or \u next to an inner \U or \L (and, I suppose, the automatic reordering kicks in). /L/e/k/t/u -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBN2n/Nf4C0a0jUw5YEQIVVwCg2/6V4h6XkUiUZINh0CAgU5buipIAn3an E+67WJHS5krIn0MBF/p+g7P5 =3DWERd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- =3D=3D=3D=3D Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore= ?) =3D=3D=3D=3D Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to =3D=3D=3D=3D fwp-request@technofile.org