On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 08:25:24AM -0400, Mike Giroux wrote: > > > Also, do I really save any CPU time with the <<'' rather than <<"" in > > > the first part of this last example? > > IIRC, I read somewhere that at "compilation" time qq strings that > don't need interpolation are compiled to an equivalent token type to > q (') strings. > > If that's the case, then you won't have any runtime penalty, and the > startup penalty is not going to be noticeable, since parsing an > empty string is hardly challenging :) Ah. Clever. Of course, the point that if I'm that concerned about performance I', using the wrong language is also very well taken. In any case, I am pretty rigorous about using '' in uninterpolated strings so that it's _obvious_ that the string does not contain any $vars. Tom -- -- Tom Rathborne tomr@aceldama.com -- http://www.aceldama.com/~tomr/ -- "I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my life-style." ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore?) ==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to ==== fwp-request@technofile.org