On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 04:03:54AM -0400, mjd-perl-@plover.com wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 12:28:19AM -0700, Derek Balling wrote: > > > At 02:49 AM 6/13/99 -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > > > >On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 01:06:32AM -0400, mjd-list-fwp@plover.com wrote: > > > > > <foghorn>It's a joke, son.</foghorn> > > > > > > > >s/It's/$1, I say, $1/ > > > > > > I truly believe you wanted : > > > > > > s/(It's)/\1, I say, \1/ > > > > > > There. Didn't you? > > > > > > Or did I miss something in the way regexes work? :) > > > > Nope, I'm just tired. :-) > > They both work. But some people say it's better to use the $1 > variables on the right-hand side of a subtitution for a couple of > reasons: Yikes. I must have been tired... I just noticed the parens... Granted, I really did mean $1, but surely mine *doesn't* work, due to my sleep-deprivation-induced lack of parens? dha -- David H. Adler - <dha@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ i gave up on every non-perl language because I had too much real work to do and it [perl] came into my life and painted pretty flowers all over my walls -Peter Fagan ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore?) ==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to ==== fwp-request@technofile.org