RE: [FWP] Gender differentiation

["Rubinow, Larry" <Larry.Rubinow@westgroup.com>]

Edward M. Perry wrote:

> > # Thru process of elimination, we can see -
> > 
> > while (<DATA>) {
> >   #print $_ if /men/io; # This only matches 'embedded' men/women...
> >   #print $_ if /(^wo)men/io; # This only matches women...
> >   #print $_ if /[^wo]men/io; # This matches nothing...
> >   #print $_ if /men\b/io; # Same as first test...
> >   print $_ if /\bmen\b/io; # This only matches embedded men...
> > }
> > 
> > __DATA__
> > Some women walking.
> > Some men walking.
> > Woman is singular.
> > Man is singular.
> > The manadin orange was rotten.
> > There are men-working here.
> > Dancing women prove sexist, news at 11.
> > 
> > HTH,
> > -Sneex-  :]
> > FCCJ Data Security Group

> I thought we also wanted to 
> match 'snowmen' while leaving 'snowwomen' 
> alone. If there is a single regex to do that, that would be _too_ much
> fun :)

Especially if it didn't match 'acumen'.  :)

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?
==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to
==== fwp-request@technofile.org