Uri wrote: > > JP> But I don't think that's as fun as > JP> @$_ = (...) for @hands; > > but it ain't fun if it don't work. :-) Yes, it's the same old story with the same old moral: If you want to look like a fool, post untested code. > aside from the loop problem, what did you even mean by @$_? a numeric > symref? This is what I had in mind: @a = (undef) x 5; # any value; it will get overwritten. for ( @a ) { @$_ = (....); } Now, as for the loop problem: why is the semantics of for as a statement modifier so different from the normal for? John Porter ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe