On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 02:08:50PM -0700, lr@hpl.hp.com wrote: > > From: Brand Hilton [mailto:bhilton@adc.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 13:46 > > To: fwp@technofile.org > > Subject: [FWP] A tiny bit of fun with a regex > > > > > > Okay, so this doesn't exactly require a PhD to find, but I did find it > > mildly amusing. If you want it to be at all challenging, you can't > > run it with -w or use strict. > > > > $_ = 'The score was 2/0 in the second inning.'; > > print "found it\n" if /\d+ > > \/ > > \d+ # find something of the pattern y/x > > /x > > Without -w or use strict, I see a division of 1 by the value of the > bareword 'x', which is undoubtedly 0, so a run-time exception. > > What do I win? Well, it was kind of an easy one, so how about a wink, a nod, and a thumbs up? I ran across it when I had the phrase "and/or" in a regex comment. I thought maybe I could hide it a little bit and make it more challenging to find. Apparently not :-) Brand ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe