merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote: > >>>>> "Rubinow" == Rubinow, Larry > <Larry.Rubinow@westgroup.com> writes: > > Rubinow> Um ... how about > > Rubinow> do $file; > > Rubinow> Technically not an eval ... > > Technically yes an eval. :) > > do EXPR Uses the value of EXPR as a filename and executes > the contents of the file as a Perl script. Its > primary use is to include subroutines from a Perl > subroutine library. > > do 'stat.pl'; > > is just like > > scalar eval `cat stat.pl`; > > except that it's more efficient and concise, keeps > track of the current filename for error messages, > searches the @INC libraries, and updates %INC if > the file is found. [...] > > Looks like an eval to me. You left out: "It also differs in that code evaluated with `do FILENAME' cannot see lexicals in the enclosing scope; `eval STRING' does." I'd call that a significant difference. Oh well, who am I to argue with Randal? Then what about my ( $module, $function ) = @_; require $module; &{"${module}::$function"}; ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe