On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Bill Jones wrote: > Tom Christiansen has already done this with 'Rot90'... Isn't Rot90 a misnomer? I would think that Rot90(Rot90(x)) should reverse x; 4 Rot90()'s should be required to get back to the original text. dean. -- dean hudson, <deanh@ero.com> research fellow, esoteric research organization ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe