At 04:04 PM 11/8/99 -0600, Tushar Samant wrote: >Being the elitist a******s that we are, I thought I would ask for >contributions to, uh, aCertainName.pm. Well, in-house we are actually >going to call it a certain name for a while, until the joke wears off. >It's in honour of one of the most baroque coders we have known. It's >not me. Really. The idea is to reimplement as many Perl keywords as >possible in Perl--in the worst, most horrendous way. For instance, > >sub substr { my($s,$o,$l) = @_; join '', (split '', $s)[$o..$o+$l-1]; } > >I don't know if this is correct, BTW. What I am looking for, though, >is not just badness but madness, preferably with a method in it. I >want something which will bring back memories when I am old. > >Another "project" I have in mind is overriding keywords with subs >that use regexes only. For instance, chop() is easy, a wrapper on >C<s/.$//>. substr could be derived from > > "(?:" . ("." x $offset) . ")(" . ("." x $len) . ")" > >How much more can be done without using eval? sub length { $_[0] =~ y///c } -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe