> From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:rjk@linguist.dartmouth.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 13:44 > To: Larry Rosler > Cc: 'Steve Lane'; fwp@technofile.org > Subject: Re: [FWP] aCertainName.pm > > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:23:40PM -0800, Larry Rosler wrote: > > > From: Steve Lane [mailto:sml@zfx.com] > > > > > > wouldn't the functions that take either a scalar > > > or list argument be easier to write using: > > > > > > @_ = ($_) unless @_; > > > > > > instead? > > > > Easier, perhaps. Correct, no! > > > > We're trying to reproduce the semantics of abs(), which say nothing > > about clobbering @_ if there is not argument. > > If there is no argument, then there is nothing in @_ to clobber. > > Correct, yes! Correct, no! my foo { my $x = abs; # Sets @_ to $_. &bar; # Expects the same arguments as foo(), namely none, but now gets $_. } @_ has been 'clobbered' by abs()! -- Larry Rosler Hewlett-Packard Laboratories http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Larry_Rosler/ lr@hpl.hp.com ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe