[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Search] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);

To: kragen@pobox.com (Kragen Sitaker)
Subject: Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 10:44:23 -0700
Cc: fwp@technofile.org
In-reply-to: Kragen Sitaker's message of Sun, 2 Jan 2000 11:46:17 -0500 (EST) . <Pine.GSO.4.10.10001021140230.26867-100000@kirk.dnaco.net>

>As far as I know, Perl doesn't currently have any binary list
>operators, although I see no reason why not.

    @x = (1,2,3) x 123;

But mostly it's better without them.  People would want
things like @a + @b to behave differently.  And then we'd
get to argue about @a * @b.

--tom

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
  - From: John Porter <jdporter@min.net>
- Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
  - From: Ariel Scolnicov <ariels@compugen.co.il>

References:
- Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
  - From: kragen@pobox.com (Kragen Sitaker)

Prev by Date: Re: [FWP] Testing list?
Next by Date: Re: [FWP] Testing list?
Prev by thread: Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
Next by thread: Re: [FWP] @a ||= (1, 2);
Navigation: Date Index | Thread Index | Search | Other lists at bumppo.net