On 19 May 2000, at 17:24, Philip Newton wrote: > Bernie Cosell wrote: > > On 19 May 2000, at 9:17, tayers@bridge.com wrote: > > > > Dumb question [as I try to puzzle out how/if this works]. Is this a > > typo: > > > > > @t{@t} = (1) x @t; > > ^ > > '%' here, perhaps?? > > No, '@'. It's a hash slice.... A brief note in my own defense, lest I get drummed off of FWP: I understand hash slices just fine. What I don't understand/remember [and I suspect never will] is Perl's baroque (and irregular to my eye) syntax. Somehow an array-indicator with curly-braces *clanked* on my eye, and my [erring] intuition thought it should be a hash-indicator there... Since I've betrayed my ignorance, I'll push my luck: is there any other context in Perl in which "@X" refers to the _hash_ named X rather than the array named X? /Bernie\ -- Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA --> Too many people, too few sheep <-- ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe