In article <20000613113552.J525@rahul.net>, Bennett Todd <bet@rahul.net> wrote: > my $last = ''; > my $cur = random_string_gen(); > my @lag = ($cur); > while (1) { > $last = $cur; > $cur = crypt($cur, $cur); > last if $last eq $cur; > $cur = random_string_gen() and @lag=($cur) if $lag[0] eq $cur; > push @lag, $cur; > $last = $cur; > $cur = crypt($cur, $cur); > last if $last eq $cur; > $cur = random_string_gen() and @lag=($cur) if shift(@lag) eq $cur; > if ($#lag > 10000) { > $cur = random_string_gen(); > @lag = ($cur); > } else { > push @lag, $cur; > } > } Ok, I give up trying to understand what this is supposed to accomplish. Can you annotate it? > or thereabouts. Naturally it'd be rather more painful to try and say > this sort o' thing in C :-). In C you would probably use a circular buffer (with start and end pointers) in place of @lag. I don't see anything inherently painful to do in C here. ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe