Re: [FWP] Factorial Elegance

[Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:30:23PM -0400, abigail@foad.org wrote:
> Furthermore, it's wise to run 'schwern' with warnings off.

That is profound in so many ways.

I've just added "no warnings 'recursion'" to Tie::math, but I still
get warnings about f() going into deep recursion since its in a
different scope.  Any ideas?  Can warnings.pm be made dynamically scoped?


> As you can see, the 'schwern' solution is way slower than anything else.

*AHEM* ...with caching SABOTAGED! :)


-- 

Michael G Schwern      http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/      schwern@pobox.com
Just Another Stupid Consultant                      Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
<mendel>         ScHWeRnsChweRN    sChWErN   SchweRN  SCHWErNSChwERnsCHwERN  
    sChWErn  ScHWeRn      schweRn           sCHWErN           schWeRn   
scHWeRN     SchWeRN      scHWErn SchwErn       scHWErn       ScHweRN      
sChwern       scHWerN        scHWeRn           scHWerN        ScHwerN      
SChWeRN scHWeRn           SchwERNschwERn        SCHwern  sCHWErN   SCHWErN   
       sChWeRn 

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe