An entity claiming to be John Porter (jdporter@min.net) wrote: : : What I think is interesting is that this seems to show : that in many people's minds, the problem domain for which : perl is suited overlaps greatly with the problem domain : which the unix tools were created to address. : And perl isn't always the winner. :-/ : Yes, but the utility of the unix tools is stretched to its limit when the task involves a union of their respective functionalities. I was under that assumption that one of the reasons Perl even exists is that it was a superset of the unix tools, like the "beads and string" analogy in the intro to the Llama. Remember, also, that "sort -u" is a terse symbolic encoding for a much larger function, whereas we could avoid the -e flag and place all the code in a file called "f" and it would be shorter than "sort -u". Figuring out my point is left as an exercise to reader. ;) Perhaps I just see the comparison as being somewhat "unfair". Mark -- Mark Rogaski | "God is REAL ... unless previously wendigo@pobox.com | declared as an INTEGER." http://3503455489/~wendigo | I do not patronize amazon.com __END__ | http://www.nowebpatents.org/