On Dec 6, Piers Cawley said: >> $;=26;$,=84;$"=$,;$_='--i$(f/s;({)}".)${.((+).$1'. >> ')3$/==/o$;;2r$$d=$"-(=;$4)+1$+%,;$ni;trp(r $hc;'. >> ')=e9-};v#laxnSqYj5{{}uw})j{|n)n~)TtqlZi&';s/(.)(. >> )/$2$1/xg;s/(.{2})(.)(.{3})/$3$1$2/g;eval;print$/; > >It prints "Just another Perl hacker,". >Canonical form is "Just another Perl hacker." When Randal began using simple JAPHs, his were merely: print "Just Another Perl Hacker,"; I believe an ending comma is perfectly fine. As for the code itself... I like. I've not seen this type of obfuscation (to my knowledge). Hmm, I might as well toss a JAPH up here. M^q@@;BEGIN{close"stderr"}print+H|R&k,G^w|E,Q&x|c,,,, M&~i|t,,,q^&q|^^q&l],&^q|jm>|,N|d|A&c,v&q~|~,c^H^C,w& M|a,qq<\x11A"\x17\x1b\x09Rh\x0d\x0c\x18\x11x>^<<,,,,, carrier lost ,,;!EOF ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe