On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > > Those of us who have been on this mailing list since its inception know > that Vicki's original intent in founding the list was to share bits of Perl > code like this, where the puzzle is to figure out what they're supposed to > do, why they work, and what a good way to do it would have been. > > It's true that the list now focuses more on challenges and Perl golf, but > these code snippets are still fun as well. I'm rather put off by the > implication that Vicki's posting to her own mailing list doesn't qualify as > being fun. Thanks for the repost, and sorry if my tongue-in-cheek speculation came across as implying that Vicki's message was off topic. Such can happen in text-only communication, and smileys etc. may not always help. Maybe I just let too much of my bitterness show, since the function she posted was all too familiar. My first reaction, before I remembered where I was, was "Oh, another one. Should I fix this or should I leave it and do something that actually makes a difference?" Luckily, in this job I only have to deal with Dreamweaver-generated HTML, which is sane enough once all the FONT tags are stripped away. And one Matt Wrong script, which I don't have to touch unless I feel like it, and when I will, it'll most likely be with rm(1). -- Ilmari Karonen - http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ "I couldn't write a serious program from scratch to save my life. As an admin I often have to write little programs (mostly in shell and perl) to deal with the fact that many professional coders share my disability." -- Bill Cole in sdm ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe