Re: [FWP] syntax barriers?

[Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>]

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:54:59PM +0300, Ilmari Karonen <iltzu@sci.fi> wrote:
> I think multiple evals -- one way or another -- are the only thing that
> will work for any input.  After all, the user code might contain an
> unclosed string or heredoc, or maybe POD.  Or use a source filter.

I agree. However, since this is an exceptional case anyway I'd also opt for a
suboptimal solution that catches "most" problems. Anyway, this was a
theoretical question (that I always was interested in ;).

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@goof.com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe