On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 09:53:12PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.ne.mediaone.net> wrote: > > and second you have an equally fuzzy notion of what a "match" is against > > None of abigail's notions are fuzzy; in fact, they are very precise. [...] > > An infinite string is a map from Z+ (postivite integers) to > characters. actually, abigails argument is based on a _very_ different definition of a "string" (namely uncountable ones), so abigails notations are at least fuzzy to you. > > First off, there is *NO* 1-1 such mapping, but that's a math subtlety > > that doesn't really matter, obvious to you or not. > > Be assured that Abigail has a firm grasp of such subtlety (and that > there is such a mapping, which I think you can figure out if you > haven't already). Actually, there isn't. At least when using your own definitions ;) -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe