[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Search] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length

To: Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>
Subject: Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
From: schwern@pobox.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:38:29 -0400
Cc: fwp@technofile.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: irons-bumppo:net-mpfwp@bumppo.net
In-Reply-To: <89780000.993915476@dizzy>; from lembark@wrkhors.com on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:37:56AM -0500
References: <20010625203006.P13819@blackrider> <89780000.993915476@dizzy>

On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:37:56AM -0500, Steven Lembark wrote:
>    Inline_C:   1094749     <-- looks larger?
>    Japhy:            159379
>    Perl:                163881
> 
> Or am I missing something?

Yes, the Inline::C version blows the doors off all the Perl versions.
When I said they were basically the same speed, I ment the two Perl
versions, sorry.

-- 
Michael G Schwern   <schwern@pobox.com>   http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance     <perl-qa@perl.org>       Kwalitee Is Job One

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe

References:
- Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
  - From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
- Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
  - From: Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
Next by Date: Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
Prev by thread: Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
Next by thread: Re: [FWP] Quick hack for common length
Navigation: Date Index | Thread Index | Search | Other lists at bumppo.net