On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 04:55:39AM -0400, Joshua Juran wrote: > I think webslave is talking about something I have also thought about: > Distribute the source for free, and the distribution (compiled executable > plus other files) as shareware. This is clearly legit if it's your > software -- you can do anything you want with it. Otherwise, I wonder if > charging a few bucks for preparing the distribution qualifies as a > "reasonable copying fee". So it's completely open, but you can still make > money off those who don't want the hassle of compiling it themselves. That > wouldn't go over so well in unixland, but on the Mac we're used to being > asked to pay for shareware. > Why do you say it wouldn't go over so well in unixland? Isn't that how Red Hat et al. make money? Ronald ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ==== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-forum-request@macperl.org