At 5.39 -0400 1999.07.16, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Chris Nandor wrote: > >> Well, libgd has been taken off the net. Does GD need to be removed from >> the MacPerl distribution? >> >> http://www.boutell.com/gd/ >> >If it's a permanent removal, maybe we can go with the last available >version. Certainly there can't be any legal issues with that. > >It's a useful module, and it would be a shame to drop it. I think. I've looked more into it, and it appears to me that the issue is LZW compression, which gd1.5 uses and gd1.3 does not. GD.pm uses gd1.2, and I don't know what kind of compression it uses. Boutell was concerned about possible legal problems even with the RLE encoding in gd1.3 (saying that there might be a problem using something that LZW decompressors can decompress), but I don't see that as a reasonable legal issue. So the question, to me, is whether or not gd1.2 uses RLE or LZW, and what the author of GD.pm is going to do. -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ==== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-porters-request@macperl.org