Re: [MacPerl-Porters] Identifying Ported Modules

[Chris Nandor <pudge@pobox.com>]

At 00.36 -0600 2000.01.12, Matthew Langford wrote:
>As you know, all that is really relevant for most modules is what flavor
>of 68K versus PPC.  As far as I'm concerned, CPAN makes no sense for
>statically compiled installations.

I don't understand this.  Most modules on CPAN have nothing to do with XS
or C code.  Most modules on CPAN that work on MacPerl work fine on the
statically linked MacPerl.


>Also, IMNSHO, 68K is very close to
>obsolete, but perhaps CFM68K has a year or two of life left.

I disagree.  There are lots of 040s out there with a lot of life left.

-- 
Chris Nandor          mailto:pudge@pobox.com         http://pudge.net/
%PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10  1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])

==== Want to unsubscribe from this list?
==== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-porters-request@macperl.org