At 00.54 -0600 2000.01.13, Matthew Langford wrote: >> >Also, IMNSHO, 68K is very close to >> >obsolete, but perhaps CFM68K has a year or two of life left. >> >> I disagree. There are lots of 040s out there with a lot of life left. > >Maybe. What's the last MacOS they can run? 8.x? I think 7.6 or 7.5.5 is the last OS any Mac can run. I do not recall. >Will they have Carbon >support? Probably not, but I do not know. >If you and/or others stop providing binaries because MacOS X >makes compilation easy, will they be able to run anything other than core >Perl? I did not say I would stop providing binaries for Mac OS, but that I likely would not provide general CPAN binaries for Mac OS X. At least I think I said that. :) Two completely different perls. >If MacOS X takes off, Carbonization and the "normal" perl will >further marginalize 68K users to a tiny, tiny minority. That is, for better or worse, up to the users. If enough users want 68K support, then it likely will be provided in some form. I don't see MacPerl as we know it going away any time soon, so I wouldn't worry about it for now. >And the way you feel about providing binaries for non-techie users, I feel >about providing development environment support for ancient history. The >irony in this statement comes from the fact that I'm writing this on my >PowerMac 7100/80, one or one-and-a-half generations removed from the >'040s. :) I use a 7100/66 (even more ancient than yours :) as my router, IRC client, and testing machine for doing Apple events over the network. I do not have an 040, though I have an 030 (without a working monitor, of course). I think the 040 and 020 are the only Mac processors I have never owned (but for the G4). I have had the 68000, 030, 601, 603, 604, 750. Heh. -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ==== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-porters-request@macperl.org