8/7/99, Randy M. Zeitman wrote: >Is this a bug or am I missing something? (very hopefully the latter...) > >Given: >@a = (1,2,3); >@b = (4,5,6); >push @refs, [@a]; >push @refs, [@b]; I find it cleaner and more flexible (and more efficient) to use refs exclusively, ie... $a = [ 1, 2, 3 ] ; $b = [ 4, 5, 6 ] ; $refs = [] ; push @$refs, $a ; push @$refs, $b ; Then <scalar @$refs> tells you how many rows, and you get at values with a uniform, readable syntax: $value = $refs->[$RowNum]->[$FieldNum] ; The syntax changes very little in the case your 'rows' ( $a and $b ) are hashes: $a = { x=>1, y=>2, z=>3 } ; $b = { x=>4, y=>5, z=>6 } ; $refs = [] ; push @$refs, $a ; push @$refs, $b ; $value = $refs->[$RowNum]->{y} ; rkm ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ==== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-webcgi-request@macperl.org