Giles Francis Hall <ghall@sierra.latin.pvt.k12.il.us> writes: >Shawn Pearce wrote: >>Haven't, becuase (no offense Matthias), but MacPerl just isn't good enough >>to be a CGI. Way to slow, and it can only handle _1_ script at a time. Actually, as long as you aren't using server push, MacPerl behaviour is essentially indistinguishable from Unix Perl in this respect. As opposed to AppleScript, MacPerl does FIFO queueing. I fully agree that MacPerl performance is far less than ideal for a heavily loaded site (as Greg Knauss would say, it just doesn't give you enough high-tech penis-inches in the WWW locker room), but there are enough sites on the information backwoods dirt road for which it does just fine. >Hey, is there a Windows'95 Perl? Yes, although it started under the name "NTPerl". >Giles Francis Hall <ghall@sierra.latin.pvt.k12.il.us> >Latin School of Chicago Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher neeri@iis.ethz.ch Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.