hal@dtor.com (Hal Wine) >At 09:23 96-02-28, Matthias Ulrich Neeracher wrote: > >>Regarding comp.* groups, I have a slight preference for comp.lang.perl.mac >>over comp.sys.mac.programmer.perl, as there are the precedents of >>comp.lang.{forth,pascal}.mac. > >I think the time is right for comp.lang.perl.mac. The major advantage >is that new MacPerl users would have a better chance of having their >postings answered. Right now, unless they mention Mac or MacPerl in >the subject line, many of the messages go unanswered, I'm afraid. > >Most of the clpm messages I respond to involve redirecting the folks to >this list. Agreed. >Hmm, actually, I think I'd prefer comp.lang.perl.nonunix. That'd stop >a proliferation into multiple sub groups. I doubt that MS-DOS/NT traffic is of particular relevance for MacPerl users and vice versa. Let them get their own newsgroup :-) Besides, classifying groups as to what they are *not* is frowned upon. The only example I know is alt.sex.not :-) We wouldn't want our group to end up as comp.lang.nonjava.nonunix. Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> http://err.ethz.ch/members/neeri.html "One fine day in my odd past..." -- Pixies, _Planet of Sound_