>>>>> schinder@pjstoaster.pg.md.us (Paul Schinder) writes: > MakeMaker is pointless unless you have a reasonably good imitation of > make, which I'd guess even most MacPerl users don't have (I don't) , > let alone most Mac users. I *really* wish the module users would > realize this, that we all *do* have one program, Perl, and that they > should write their standard installer entirely in Perl. You're right. That's why many perts of the Makefile already run perl scripts, and why there is already a make replacement written in perl. It's alpha, but you're welcome to check how it works on the Mac. $CPAN/authors/id/NI-S/Make-0.01.tar.gz You're out of luck, of course, for modules that need a compiler :-] andreas