At 15:16 7/30/96, PVHP@LNS62.LNS.CORNELL.EDU wrote: >>$LF = "\012"; >>$CR = "\015"; >>$DOSeol = "$CR$LF"; >>$MacEol = "$CR"; >>$UNIXeol = "$LF"; > >Not that this is not excellent advice (I think it is) but I am curious: is >there some reason not to use hexadecimal or decimal sets? Nothing wrong with hex if you're sending me code. I haven't worked on machines where octal was sensible since around 1961 (PDP-1 (not a typo), TX-0, and IBM 7094 <and on back to 704>). OTOH, I worked on a decimal machine which printed its hex by using the 6 characters which filled in after the value 9 in the 4-bit digit form. space was 12; spaces as significant characters in memory dumps are unhandy (+, -, @ and whatever else fit in there aren't nearly so bad). --John -- Development of software takes longer and costs more. jwbaxter@olympus.net (John W. Baxter) Port Ludlow, WA, USA