mark@cheers.jsc.nasa.gov (Mark Manning/Metrica) writes: >On the previous problem with the printf, I realized I was >mixing my FORTRAN and Perl together. (Man - too many >languages running around in my head. :-) ). I should have >used "%d" instead of "%i". So let me ask this: Why did it >produce a "1" when the "%i" was used? Still curious. :-) When doing an s?printf, Perl breaks up the format string until it finds a %-spec. %i being a Standard C extension and Perl being pre-Std C, Perl doesn't know about %i and ends up calling sprintf(s, "%i"), which essentially inserts an architecture dependent nonsense number into the stream. You probably should report this bug (just run "perlbug" on your workstation). Point out that modern C defines %i as a synonyme for %d. Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher neeri@iis.ethz.ch "These days, though, you have to be pretty technical before you can even aspire to crudeness." -- William Gibson, _Johnny Mnemonic_