According to Nat Irons: > It would appear that Apple is setting groundwork for a future conflict, > that in five years it's not going to be an Apple/Microsoft decision but a > Unix/NT decision. Apple is proposing the consolidation of power and beauty > over an alternative with neither and nobody's... paying... attention. Yet. An off topic discussion again eh? :-) (Always livens things up a bit. Not that the discussion on the list is boring or anything. It is anything BUT boring. Especially with some of the code which is thrown out there by Chris, Paul, et al.) Anyway... I think Apple's commercials are really off the spot when it comes to talking about their products. What they need to do (IMHO) is to have a series of commericals where a Mac and an IBM is taken apart and then show what all is needed to buy for the IBM in order to make it match what the Macs do without any additional hardware. Then show a price comparison of the two systems in another commercial. Finally, starting from scratch, put the two systems together, install the OS's only, and then show what all you can do without installing anything else. I'm sure that if Apple showed the basics of why the Macs are so much easier to use that a lot of business people would jump off of the IBM ship and onto the Macintosh one. Or maybe they could pull a coup and have a one hour show during prime time where they show "What the clone makers don't want you to know." Eh Vicki? Eh? ;-) ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch