I must say that I agree with every syllable that Vicki has said, and it pretty thoroughly reflects things I've been thinking lately. Just a few thoughts: [quotations to be provided without attribution to minimize clutter] >My guess is that by restructuring the criteria for postings to >(Mac)Perl-related rather than Mac(Perl)-specific we could win a lot >without losing too much. We spend as much time telling people their >questions aren't germaine as we might answering them! I agree. The key problem I see is, as other have said, when you are faced with a script which doesn't behave as expected, you might not know if the problem is your understanding of Perl, an idiosyncrasy with the Mac implementation, a bug in the Mac version, or a bug in the core. And, even if it is "core" rather than Mac, this could still be on-topic because: it isn't in the MacPerl Book but maybe should be, it's there but isn't clear, or it's there but isn't in the index. Usually, you don't know which category your question falls under until you know the answer. The corollary to this is that if you do need to look elsewhere, it's on comp.lang.perl.misc, which is quite hostile in tone, and very unfriendly to beginners. This just isn't a place I would recommend to anyone, even to lurk--at least if you are bothered by people being wantonly cruel to one another. (Sorry--I had to comment....) So, I'd be all for expanding the scope of this list. If the volume becomes overpowering, we could consider splitting it up then, but I think it might be a good idea to not worry over it prematurely. I think "mac-perl-www for CGIs, HTML processing & so on" is a good idea; I worry that the mac-perl-toolbox v. mac-perl-bugs v. mac-perl distinction might be vague enough to promote cross-posting (or confusion) and defeat its own purpose. And I also doubt that we have to worry much about non-Mac people posting hugely off-topic things--just having "Mac" in the name of the list will scare off 99% of them. >I get about 80 unsubscriptions every month; I don't count how many of >those move to -announce, change addresses, or drop out altogether, but I >consider the turnover fairly high. I wonder if the turnover is due to displeasure with the list, or just lack of time to read everything (or lack of time to program). Also, I unsubscribed because my local usenet feed is subscribed, so I can read the list as though it were a newsgroup. Is the running total fairly constant? >For me, this is the direction to be taken. >And I suggest that people like Chris, Matthias, Paul and others don't >have to feel compelled to answer every RTFM-question that comes up. I >answered a couple of these questions off the list in the past, in an >effort to reduce tensions. We need these people to deal with the real >hard stuff. > * A novice MacPerl user should have a more "polite" place to > hang out than c.l.p.m. Sure, they should be told to look > in the MacPerl book, PODs, etc., but *nicely*. And, if a > new (or old :-) MacPerl user occasionally asks a question > that isn't specific to MacPerl, that's OK. I think this is how things should work. If people ask FAQs occassionally, then hey, that's life, it won't kill us--they're FAQs because they are, well, frequently asked. For my part, I answer questions to help people out--I don't much care the "level" of the question. And if I can answer it by pointing them to a URL or a FAQ, then great. If I don't have time to answer it, then that's fine too, maybe someone else will. But it bums me out when someone stomps on someone else just for asking a question--it just promotes bad feelings and flame wars and divides the community, and wastes bandwidth far more than the original question. (Not that this happens much on this list, but on c.l.p.m, oh my....) As Vicki pointed out, as the volume of Perl documentation grows, so does the difficulty of locating any particular perl of wisdom.... (On a side note, I'd like to point out that most questions you'd be tempted to ask here, as well as many others, would be warmly received in the comp.sys.mac.programmer.help newsgroup, although they are less likely to be answered due to the smaller number of Perl experts there. I'm not recommending that eveyone move over there, just if you have a question and you're afraid it's off-topic on the MacPerl list you can try there, and you are unlikely to be flamed for it.) Anyway, just my several cents. -- __________________________________________________________________________ Jeff Clites Online Editor http://www.MacTech.com/ online@MacTech.com MacTech Magazine __________________________________________________________________________ ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch