At 23.47 -0400 1998.07.18, Jeff at MacTech wrote: >Has anyone tried building Perl under Rhapsody/DR2? I heard from one person >that the standard Perl distribution doesn't work, but I don't know how >hard he tried. I did not build it, but I ran it. perl5.004_04, IIRC. Maybe _02, but I think it was _04. >Also, from what I gathered at Macworld the plan is that in >the consumer release of OS X the command-line won't be accessible (but >will be using the dev tools). If this is so, then we'll still need >MacPerl, or something like it, under OS X (althought the porting may be >much easier). I imagine a terminal app thing will be freely available to all who want it. >Question: Does the standard Perl dist. build under MkLinux, or only under >LinuxPPC? (Just curious.) I built perl5.004_04 in MkLinux DR2.1 Update6 with gcc, but needed to change some flags to enable dynamic loading. I submitted a patch for perl5.004_05 to hints/linux.sh, but it is missing in perl5.004_75; since I do not currently have MkLinux installed, and have not tried the new perl betas or the prerelease MkLinux DR3s, I don't know what the status of any of it currently is. >Also, since Vicki brought it up, Be is definitely built on top of a Unix, >although I don't remember if it is BSD, so that's probably why it is >mentiond in the Perl 5.005 beta announcement (altough it still would have >been appropriate to mention the Mac, since they say, "If you find that >your platform is unsupported, do let us know."). Last I checked, perl for BeOS did not support sockets fully, so I kinda think that BeOS is not really that close to being Unix; either that, or it was something broken in BeOS (BeOS was in preview release at the time). -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch