At 11:53 -0400 98/08/10, Chris Nandor wrote: > At 11.00 -0400 1998.08.10, Jeff at MacTech wrote: > > So, if the goal is to prototype > >(ie, write a quick version to experiment and then a final version in C), > >you might as well just write it in C--it won't take any more code, and > >when you are done prototyping, you are _done_--you don't have to >translate > >back into C, and you won't have wasted time writing the C-to-Perl adaptor > >code. And if you write it in C++ using a framework, it will be even less > >work. This is just the impresssion that I get. > > That is a very good and important point, however, consider that in some > ways you can test Perl code more easily than C code. Make a change, hit > command-shift-R. Also, consider if you will, those of us who don't have a decent C compiler on our Macs :-) That is, for some of us the goal is not, precisyl, to prototype ;-) I have the MPW C compiler (I don't use it, but I have it) but Think C / Symantec / Metrowerks all cost money and I haven't (yet) seen the GNU c compiler ported to the Mac. Besides which, I don't actually like C very much. And I like C++ less. So now the question could be turned to: is there a faster way to prototype the GUI before casting it in MacPerl? What about FaceSpan? muddying the waters - Vicki --- Vicki Brown, vlb@cfcl.com |\ _,,,---,,_ Journeyman Sourceror ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Scripts & Philtres |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' http://www.cfcl.com/~vlb '---''(_/--' `-'\_) P.O. Box 1269 San Bruno, CA 94066 ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch