>Matthew Langford <langfml [at] eng [dot] auburn [dot] edu> writes: >>rolling up sleeves...anybody thought about porting PowerPlant? :) > >I did, last year or so. Interfacing to it would be sufficient, no need to >port. > >>Actually, though I meant it as a joke, are there any reasons it _couldn't_ >>be done, other than common sense? > >Legalities. Making it possible to write arbitrary PowerPlant applications in >MacPerl would probably step quite a bit outside the PowerPlant license. > >However, I'll meet Greg Galanos of Metrowerks soon, and I could pitch the idea >to him. PowerPlant-enhanced MacPerl? PerlPlant? Can I buy two dozen educational licenses? Actually, what *I* would _really_ love to have is something like SuperCard (PerlCard?), but with Perl as scripting language rather than SuperTalk. Would that too be a step outside the PowerPlant license? $WINDOW{"Untitled 1"}->OK_button->disable; $MENU{"File"} = new Menu [ "Open..." => \&Open, "Close" => \&Close, "Save as..." => \&Save, "Save/S" => \&Save, "Page Setup..." => \&Page_setup, "Print..." => \&Print, "Quit" => \&Quit ]; I haven't tried/seen Tk, would that be similar? (And there still isn't Perl/Tk for MacPerl, is there? My stomach doesn't agree with Tcl.) -Lasse ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch