"Mark Manning/Muniz Eng." <markem@flash.net> writes: >I don't know - being able to rapidly create an application via Perl and >then having it generate C/C++ (whichever) code to do that could really >make Perl (and on our Macs MacPerl) become the language of choice to >develop code in. I still think the C/C++ backend option is overrated. What is missing in this debate is that the C/C++ backend still needs at least 80% of the Perl runtime, if not 100%, to run. Thus, you gain at most a minimal improvement in speed vs. byte code. Byte code should be a massive improvement in speed vs. source code and a significant improvement in size vs. C/C++. Matthias -- Matthias Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~neeri "Have you heard of the new Cambridge compilers ? They distribute gear-wear much more evenly" -- William Gibson/Bruce Sterling, _The Difference Engine_ ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch