John W Baxter writes: >At 21:32 -0500 1/15/99, Chris Nandor wrote: >> >> This discussion seems to have died. Did we come to a resolution? Will we >> keep it the same, and I'll add a note to perlport? >I concluded near the point at which the debate died that it's >probably more important to conform to the Perl form (so that code >which makes the unwarranted assumption about error formats never >changing will run) than to the MPW form of error messages. As one >who started out strongly in the MPW-format camp, I thought I should >mention my change. Since I was also someone who was arguing for retaining the MPW style die format, I should also mention that I'm perfectly willing to have it change to the standard form. I still want the MPW style die messages, but I figure I'm willing to make a module that traps die() messages and reformats the error. Once thats done and put in my PERL5OPTS, perl will still act like an MPW tool to me. Modules that also trap die() will see standard format perl error messages, and everyone else will be happy. (and everyone who things that MPW is a pseudo-Unix environment can continue their delusion.) -- Andrew Langmead ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch