On 1/27/99 at 14:56, raffael@mediaone.net (Raffael Cavallaro) wrote: > In the same way, > we got a "MacOS 8" that had the name, but none of the promised features - > remember, MacOS 8 was originally Copland, and was promised to include memory > protection and PMT, nether of which was delivered). It's been a while, but my recollection is that the MacOS8 name was adopted purely as a disingenuous device to kill off the clone licensing and had nothing to do with the original schedule for substantive OS enhancements. I also think that Copland was not supposed to be especially radical (as in providing protected memory, getting rid of extensions, etc.), but its successor, Gershwin, was. At this point, I'm not sure if there is a meaningful way to correlate one thing to another, but I basically consider OS8.5.x to be Copland. In any case, I anticipate that anything that Jobs says will be delivered will indeed be released more or less on time and more or less as described. Altho Apple has had more than its share of missed deadlines, a recent Wired survey tagged NT 5.0/Win 2000 as last year's foremost vaporware and I suspect that the chronic slacker crown has passed to Microsoft. Richard Gordon Gordon Consulting & Design Voice: 770-565-8267 Fax: 770-971-6887 ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch