I still get by with a Quadra 900 (25MHz 68040, for you really young folks <grin>), although I have upgraded it to 52MB RAM, 2MB VRAM and a 4.3GB hard drive. I originally got it to use in my desktop publishing company-- a short-lived career, because of the pressures and imbeciles-- so it started life with me as a 24MB/2V/1.8GB machine. I avoid Adobe Acrobat like the waste it is (embarrasses me to think that they've convinced so many people that it's ideal for the web!) and haven't bought a new video game for four years, but it runs OS 8.1 just fine! Browsing is okay with Lynx or Mosaic... :) Seriously, I use Netscape 4 most of the time, and just turn off graphics. I'm budgeting to buy a G4 this fall... That ought to provide a worthwhile improvement. :) Michael On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Chris Nandor wrote: > >Seriously, I do all my stuff at home on a 6100/60, and I've yet to run > >into anything where speed was actually so much of an issue that I felt the > >urge to go out and get a G3 or a 450MHz Dell. Except (and this is no joke) > >when trying to read docs using Acrobat Reader. > > Yeah, it is funny how we think the latest speed is more important than it > is. The Finder is the slowest thing to use on my old 7100/66. The web > browser is not too speedy. But I use it for routing IP packets, IRC, > MacPerl, BBEdit, and some web browsing, and it handles the job fine and <snip> > Most people can still get by fine with a 601 processor, except for one > thing: web browsing. Web browsers and streaming video and other multimedia > are the only reason for most people to get G3s. It's pretty silly. If <snip> or 3D simulations and rendering... mailto:micsteel@jump.net || http://www.jump.net/~micsteel/ finger:micsteel@jump.net for .plan Smiling saves energy! ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch