>Note that there is a rewrite project going on which will result in >Majordomo 2.0. I have it on (reasonably) reliable authority that the >rewrite is modular. And Perl5 compliant. > >I don't know the ETA, but perhaps Majordomo 2.0 would be the one to port? > >(I also don't know how desperate Brian is ;-) The more I look at the 1.94.4 code, the more I think perhaps it might be better to port the 2.0 version. I'm not as desperate as I was when I started this. It seems that part of the problem I was having was independant of the recalcitrant freeware, and only resolvable by contacting my provider (which I've done). Porting Majordomo will continue, because I WANT it, rather than just needing it. --Brian