On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Richard Gordon wrote: > That's a possibility. Another is that I have seen why programmers > habitually fail to meet the expectations of the people who pay them > because they get off on theoretical tangents that don't yield any > tangible benefits to the suits.The suits don't care how something > gets done, they just want it to run more or less like they envisioned > and take it for granted that everything is going to work. > Ronald's point being (and I agree with him) that the Schwartzian Transform is a well-established and documented Perl sorting technique. Randal Schwartz first identified and codified this usage (hence the name), although the technique was certainly in use prior - it's just that nobody else woke up to the general utility of it. So, if nothing else, the S.T. is not a theoretical tangent. I have to agree with Ronald, again - why does elegance != simplicity in your opinion? You're confusing elegance with obfuscation. True elegance IS simplicity. Arved ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org