> ''Nothing is foolproof. But if you're talking about the > average high-end hacker, we think we can catch them.'' I don't know about you, Chris, but I'd take offense at their use of the word "average". [wink] > But what apparently did in Nandor was a certain amount > of laziness uncharacteristic of his hero, Garciaparra. > In his first attempt, in May, Orwant said, Nandor used > the same e-mail address. His last attempt, in June, he > used the same phone number (111-222-3333) and Zip Code > (11111). My guess is that you'd have to insure that the telephone exchanges matched up with the zip codes, in order to do a thorough job of it. That seems like a pretty tall order. I wouldn't call it laziness, I'd call it a pratical compromise, though it seemed pretty likely that the stunt would be discovered... In fact, it looks suspiciously like those numbers were intended to be discovered... It still doesn't explain how they traced it to Chris? Unless that was the point about: > ''I've examined his program and can confirm that it would > have stuffed the ballot box,'' Orwant said in an e-mail > message to the Globe, to whom he had indirectly provided a > tip about Nandor's activities. ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org