On Sat, 28 Aug 1999 03:11:46 +1000, Peta Adams - John Murray wrote: >Anyway, I did some testing [got a bit long winded] but any further comment >would be sincerely appreciated. > >for (X){ > print 'looped a time',"\n"; >} >OUTPUT: >Y Ok, here's one comment. It has the great feature of running the loop ONCE (always), but with the loops variable as an ALIAS to the original scalar, so, effectively, it is a "with" statement: $\ = "\n"; $x = "before"; for my $y ($x) { print "Run once!"; $y = "changed!"; } print $x; -> Run once! changed! $x needn't be a simple variable. If the scalar is a really complex value, e.g. a dereference through many stages, and you drop the optional loop variable (here $y), you can simply access (read/write) the scalar through $_. Imagine the "for" as meaning "with". The only difference with a real "with" syntax structure is that "last" inside it, still recognizes this loop as a loop. In a real "with" statement, this wouldn't be the case, I guess. -- Bart. ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org