>From vlb@cfcl.com Sat Jun 12 13:48:34 1999 - apologies for the delay - vlb] Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906122050.NAA16546@a2b01118.paralynx.bconnected.net> To: tushar@i-works.com CC: fwp@technofile.org In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990612152817.340A-100000@zeppo.i-2.com> (message from Tushar Samant on Sat, 12 Jun 1999 15:35:23 -0500 (CDT)) References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990612152817.340A-100000@zeppo.i-2.com> >>>>> "Tushar" == Tushar Samant <tushar@i-works.com> writes: Tushar> Other suggestions are also welcome. Default? Backup? Tushar> Reserve? Relief? Pinch? scratch -- Brad Murray "Anyway, you can tell that CreateProcess is simply wrong, Perl Geek not just because it's too complicated yet too limited, but because its name is long and ugly." Tom Christiansen ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore?) ==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to ==== fwp-request@technofile.org </x-flowed>