>From vlb@cfcl.com Fri Jun 11 12:25:18 1999 - apologies for the delay - vlb] Message-Id: <v04020a15b38709a40689@[192.168.0.77]> In-Reply-To: <3761573B.9AC60E30@netscape.com> References: <v04020a01b386a6a9a617@[192.168.0.77]> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:48:59 -0400 To: John Kristian <kristian@netscape.com> Cc: fwp@technofile.org At 14.36 -0400 1999.06.11, John Kristian wrote: >Chris Nandor wrote: > >> if (not can Mozilla::LDAP::Entry 'getLDIFrecords') { >> *Mozilla::LDAP::Entry::getLDIFrecords = sub { >> [snip] >> }; >> } >> >> It does the same thing, but avoids the eval. You don't need a separate >> package declaration, you can just put it in the sub declaration. > >Huh? Would you give an example, please? Or did you mean to say I don't need >any package declaration at all (as in the example above)? You do not need a package declaration. You can use "sub Package::Foo::Bar::Sub" to create a sub Sub() in package Package::Foo::Bar. Of course, since we don't want the sub to be created unless it meets the criteria in the expression above, we can't use "sub foo {}". Our choices are to eval it, or to assign a coderef to a typeglob. Some people prefer evals, wanting to avoid typeglobs whenever possible. I prefer to avoid evals whenever possible. -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore?) ==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to ==== fwp-request@technofile.org </x-flowed>