-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:05:37 -0400, Bill Jones <bill@fccj.org> wrote: >You need a macro closure \E before the next \U, re - > > print "\L\uHELLO, \E\U\lWORLD\E\n"; > I would be more convinced if that wouldn't work: print "\LHELLO, \Uworld\E\n"; hello, WORLD but it does. *Just* adding a \l next to \U causes a syntax error: print "\LHELLO, \l\Uworld\E\n"; syntax error at -e line 1, near "\LHELLO, \l\U" Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors. but if it is not contiguous to it, like in: print "\LHELLO, \Uw\l\ORLD\E\n"; hello, WORLD it doesn't signal a syntax error (though the \l doesn't work, either). But obviously is not a matter of using \E before using a new \U or \L (and in fact documentation doesn't imply that it is needed, as far as I understand it). /L/e/k/t/u -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBN2i3BP4C0a0jUw5YEQK7DwCfdWTu3+FHplxlOnQfHGftwGFHkicAnj14 wGfv3bGwAA2H0NCuMG+H+r9g =3D1OA4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- =3D=3D=3D=3D Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore= ?) =3D=3D=3D=3D Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to =3D=3D=3D=3D fwp-request@technofile.org