On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 10:16:45PM -0500, Tushar Samant wrote: > > $q^=$p^=$q^=$p > > (probably well-known; if not, try it) ($p,$q) = ($q,$p); $ perl -MBenchmark -e 'local $/; open(STUFF, "/usr/dict/words") or die $!; $data = <STUFF>; $p = $data; $q = reverse $data; timethese(shift, { "bitwise" => sub { $q^=$p^=$q^=$p }, "list" => sub { ($p,$q)=($q,$p) }})' Benchmark: running bitwise, list, each for at least 3 CPU seconds... bitwise: 4 wallclock secs ( 3.22 usr + 0.00 sys = 3.22 CPU) @ 74.22/s (n=239) list: 3 wallclock secs ( 3.02 usr + 0.00 sys = 3.02 CPU) @ 127.48/s (n=385) About 70% faster. -- Michael G Schwern schwern@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~schwern /(?:(?:(1)[.-]?)?\(?(\d{3})\)?[.-]?)?(\d{3})[.-]?(\d{4})(x\d+)?/i ==== Want to unsubscribe from this list? (Don't you love us anymore?) ==== Well, if you insist... Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to ==== fwp-request@technofile.org