At 01:36 PM 9/23/99 -0400, John Porter wrote: >Peter Scott wrote: > > At 09:36 AM 9/23/99 -0400, John Porter wrote: > > > > >foo { 'bar', 'quux' }; > > > > > >was foo declared as foo($) or foo(&)? > > > > But both are compile-time errors due to too many arguments, and the second > > one also loses with > > > > Type of arg 1 to main::foo must be block (not constant item) > > > > (this even without -w or strict... gotta watch those prototypes). I don't > > see it. > >Well, I don't know what you're doing wrong. > >% perl >sub foo1($) { print "foo1: @_\n" } >sub foo2(&) { print "foo2: @_\n" } > >foo1 { 'bar', 'quux' }; >foo2 { 'bar', 'quux' }; >^D >foo1: HASH(0xbc050) >foo2: CODE(0xc3bec) > >I get the exact same results on both 5.004_04 and 5.005_60, >with and without -w and strict. Fascinating. Why would this behavior be platform-dependent? % perl sub foo1($) { print "foo1: @_\n" } sub foo2(&) { print "foo2: @_\n" } foo1 ( 'bar', 'quux' ); Too many arguments for main::foo1 at - line 3, near "'quux' )" foo2 ( 'bar', 'quux' ); Type of arg 1 to main::foo2 must be block (not constant item) at - line 4, near "'quux' )" Too many arguments for main::foo2 at - line 4, near "'quux' )" ^D Execution of - aborted due to compilation errors. % perl -v This is perl, version 5.004_04 built for sun4-solaris -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe