[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Search] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)

To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Subject: Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
From: "Derek J. Balling" <dredd@megacity.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:33:03 -0700
Cc: fwp@technofile.org
In-Reply-To: <m1d7ujovuf.fsf@halfdome.holdit.com>
References: <Michael G Schwern's message of "Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:35:53 -0400"><19991012171353.A23088@toldyouso.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.9910131131360.19987-100000@zak.mailgate.net><19991013091716.A1709@mordor.net><19991013113553.A4525@toldyouso.com>


>Yeah, I gotta wonder who had to sleep with whom to get them into
>the vendor area of the conference.  That one really shook me.
>
>I think I should write Tim and see if he has any semiofficial
>response.

It would be nice to hear the response, if any.



==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe

References:
- OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
  - From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
- Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
  - From: Zak McGregor <zak@mailgate.net>
- Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
  - From: Bennett Todd <bet@mordor.net>
- Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
  - From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
- Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
  - From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)

Prev by Date: Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
Next by Date: Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
Prev by thread: Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
Next by thread: Re: OmniMark Rant (was Re: [FWP] A fun bit of obfuscation)
Navigation: Date Index | Thread Index | Search | Other lists at bumppo.net