c'mon people... Bennett Todd wrote: > > Whew. This seems to have gone in a direction I really didn't intend; I > guess my communication skills are worse than I'd feared. Your communication skills are just fine. > I'm truly sorry I larded my original posting that started this all > with so much jargon that folks from other backgrounds found it > impenetrable. That is purely inappropriate on a list like this. The posting was very interesting. "War stories" are fun and enlightening. Jargon is part of the business, and if you don't understand a term, find out what it means. Sometimes you RTFM, sometimes you ask. > I didn't take any offense at the question asking about the jargon, and > found the exercise of trying to write out a detailed description of > all the terms I used quite fun in its own right; it's always > satisfying reviewing the basics of a domain you work in. I hope others > found the explanations illuminating. The definitions (now that I've read them) were super. > I really didn't think my (apparently erroneous) attempt to deduce the > background of the questioner from the questions was insulting. Wrong, > perhaps, but I don't recall having been mean in that one. If anyone > felt I was, I'm truly sorry. You merely did what a lot of people were probably thinking. I didn't detect any rudeness, but maybe North Americans are more sensitive than I am! ta > -Bennett ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe